|
N Srinivasan seems to have staved off the stiff opposition from within
the board and will continue as the BCCI president, at least for now and
possibly till the AGM in September. A day after the arrest of Gurunath Meiyappan
- his son-in-law and a senior official of the Chennai Super Kings
franchise - on charges of betting on IPL games, the momentum that seemed
to have built up overnight to force a change at the top of the BCCI has
apparently fizzled out.
More than half the board members attended a dinner hosted by former BCCI
president Jagmohan Dalmiya in Kolkata on Saturday night - notable
absentees included vice-president Arun Jaitley, Srinivasan's presumptive
successor, joint secretary Anurag Thakur and treasurer Ajay Shirke -
but the mood seemed to be one of preserving the status quo.
Indeed, the mood was set before the dinner began, when a senior board
official indicated to ESPNcricinfo that the members 'will not demand'
Srinivasan's resignation. Srinivasan and IPL chairman Rajiv Shukla had a
private discussion in Kolkata before heading for the dinner, the source
said, adding that the likelihood of Srinivasan stepping down before the
AGM was 'very slim'.
It was in keeping with Srinivasan's defiant stand through the day. Soon
after he landed in Mumbai on Saturday afternoon, he reiterated that he
had no intention of resigning. "I cannot be bulldozed or railroaded into
resigning by the pressure being applied," he said. "The BCCI will
follow strictly all its rules. The law will take its course. Somebody
wants to replace me, let him get elected."
Where N Srinivasan can go from here |
The board members know that if Srinivasan does not resign from the job,
their options are both limited and complicated (see sidebar). According
to the BCCI constitution, a special general body meeting can move a
resolution against its president with a three-fourth majority only if
the president is directly involved in a corruption case - which is not
the case so far.
Should the BCCI call an emergency general body meeting, it may come down
to electoral numbers. Besides the 27 affiliated units who compete in
the Ranji Trophy, the Cricket Club of India, the National Cricket Club,
Kolkata and All India Universities have a vote each. If the incumbent
president is presiding over the AGM, he is also entitled to a separate
vote, thus extending the tally to 31. The last time the BCCI had a
contested election for the post of president was in 2005, when Sharad
Pawar defeated Ranbir Singh Mahendra to break Jagmohan Dalmiya's
monopoly over Indian cricket's administration.
|
Rajiv Shukla on N Srinivasan issue
|
|
There remains much internal grumbling about where this controversy
around the Chennai Super Kings' official and Srinivasan has left the
BCCI. A former board official said that Gurunath's arrest has
"tremendously harmed the credibility of Indian cricket. And the process
to restore credibility cannot even begin till he [Srinivasan] remains at
the helm."
The twist in the entire saga is the Gurunath angle. Srinivasan has
already constituted a one-man commission of inquiry, headed by Ravi
Sawani, to investigate the spot-fixing allegations against the three
Rajasthan Royals players.
If Sawani's report implicates anyone - a player or a member of support
staff or management team - from Chennai Super Kings, the report will be
forwarded to the disciplinary committee. With Srinivasan, in his
capacity as the president, being a member of the three-member committee,
there would be clear conflict of interest.
In such a case, his only option would be to recuse himself from the disciplinary committee by stepping down as the president.
Saturday night's events were an about-turn from what transpired on
Friday, well before Gurunath's arrest, with several significant
statements being made across the spectrum of politics and business that
controls Indian cricket. Sahara chairman Subroto Roy, who had earlier
this week announced his team's pullout
from the IPL and his company's decision to not renew its sponsorship of
Indian cricket, indicated he would be willing to reconsider the
decision if there was a change of guard. He went so far as to say Sharad
Pawar, a former BCCI president, was an "apt" person to head the board
once again.
Around the same time a senior member of Pawar's Nationalist Congress
Party issued an unambiguous statement saying Srinivasan should go,
though the party issued a clarification saying it was issued in a
personal capacity and didn't reflect the party's views. On Saturday,
Pawar told ESPNcricinfo that the party had no view on the matter. "I
have resigned [from the BCCI] five year ago to go to the ICC and don't
want to come back."
No comments:
Post a Comment