|
By the time they arrived in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's cricketers had lost their appetite for a fight. A luckless Brendan Taylor
lost both tosses and scored no runs at all across 20 deliveries in two
innings. His team followed his lead in two crushing defeats. The yawning
gulf between India and Zimbabwe was emphatically exposed.
The disparity between the two teams need not be measured purely in runs,
wickets and results. Long-term cricketing success is increasingly based
upon the wealth and resources available to respective cricket
authorities. It's a moneyed game and there, too, Zimbabwe simply cannot
compete. Yet the more insidious problem is not the amount that
Zimbabwe's cricketers are paid - it is how much they are valued by their
own board.
It's no secret that Zimbabwe Cricket (ZC) is in the midst of some
serious financial strife, but there is rumour and speculation
interspersed with the actual, tangible effects of that strife.
"Financially, we are not doing very well," admitted ZC president Peter Chingoka.
"The latest loss you will have seen, from our report, is that we're
down about $4.2 million last year. We're carrying serious bank loans now
which basically stagger us from one four-year cycle to the next."
The only serious money ZC brings in comes from the World Cups, with the
World T20 and television rights from bi-lateral series bringing in
smaller amounts. The organisation has not been spared by the tempestuous
Zimbabwean economy, nor by the wider global economic climate. A visit
by India, England or Australia to Zimbabwe would turn a profit, while a
South African tour would just about break even. All other tours are run
at a loss. It is for this reason that there will likely be no A tours
into or out of Zimbabwe this year. The funds simply aren't there.
It was reported in local media that ZC were set to gain $8m from India's
visit, although that figure hasn't been officially confirmed. Whatever
the actual profit from the tour eventually is, it is "basically a drop
in the ocean because of all these other problems", added Chingoka. "It's
very important, but it doesn't fill the hole, for a number of reasons.
Taken in isolation it looks very attractive, but this only happens once
every three or four years, and since India's last tour here, we're
talking about losses of maybe a million dollars for every tour."
Compare that to the money made by the BCCI for every tour they host, not
to mention the IPL, and it's easy to see why Indian cricketers'
salaries dwarf those of their Zimbabwean counterparts. Virat Kohli's Grade A central contract
nets him around US$186,000 a year - Taylor earns only a fraction of it -
and that figure doesn't include the even greater amount Kohli brings in
through endorsements. If he'd made the trip out to Zimbabwe, MS Dhoni,
the world's 16th highest paid sportsman for 2013 with earnings in excess
of US$30m, would be operating well within his means if he decided to
buy one of Zimbabwe's domestic franchises outright. Context is important
here, and in Zimbabwean terms the national cricketers are not badly
paid - but that doesn't necessarily translate to stability and security
in the work environment.
"You can't take a Virat Kohli and compare him to a Brendan Taylor,
because the company that Virat Kohli works for has got resources much
better than the company that Brendan Taylor works for," explained
Chingoka.
| "Their salaries would do quite well in commerce and industry in this country. You should take a drive with Elton Chigumbura or Prosper Utseya: where they've come from. And tell me that they're not idols. If they were doing badly, they would not be idols" Peter Chingoka | |||
"The XI guys out there, they've got a lot of people that look up to them
with envy from this country, from a Zimbabwean perspective. So that's
the context that you've got to put it in. In the context of your own
country, are you that badly off? And the answer to that would be a very
strong 'no'. If you say, in the international context, are they being
badly looked after, it would be a big 'yes'. They are badly looked after
from a point of view of comparing them with Jimmy Anderson in England
or Michael Clarke in Australia.
"Their salaries would do quite well in commerce and industry in this country. You should take a drive with Elton Chigumbura or Prosper Utseya: where they've come from. And tell me that they're not idols. If they were doing badly, they would not be idols."
The feeling seems to be that Zimbabwe's cricketers have no grounds for
complaint. They are lucky to have the jobs they have, and earn the money
they do. But given the history of the relationship between the board
and the players, it's clear which way the power dynamic leans.
Zimbabwean cricketers may be idols in the eyes of their countrymen, many
of whom live in abject poverty, but that's not always the view the
cricketing authorities hold.
"That mentality is a dangerous one because [ZC] make 100% certain that
[the players] are aware of that, but they expect them to go and compete
in an international environment," explained former captain Heath Streak,
himself jettisoned from the coaching set-up as ZC looked to cut costs
earlier this year. "It's more about how they get looked after than how
much they get paid. It's the little things that go with it - getting
paid on time, getting an allowance, getting to the hotel and finding
things are sorted, having your fuel taken care of. Just the basics
sorted out.
"All that stuff, it gets to the players. Eventually they perform like
they're getting treated and they get treated, most of the time, like
they're second-rate citizens, and that they're lucky to have the jobs
that they have and earn the incomes that they have. Instead of creating
an environment where they're accountable for their performances, and
where you have other people who aspire to be like them."
Are Zimbabwe's cricketers made to feel valued? Do they operate in a
supportive, healthy environment? One hears of past team meetings where
it was made very clear to the players that they were replaceable. That
attitude probably had its roots in the ructions between the board and
the players in the early to mid-2000s. The atmosphere isn't nearly as
poisonous these days, and during training sessions the squad seem a
genuinely happy bunch, but the life of a Zimbabwean cricketer can be a
tenuous one.
Take the example of Ray Price.
The left-arm spinner came back to Zimbabwe when the cupboards were
pretty bare in 2007, and offered six solid years of service. In that
time, he was the backbone of an often brittle bowling attack and rose to
No. 2 in the one-day rankings. Price served his team well, and wanted a
chance to say goodbye to international cricket. His team-mates wanted
to give him that chance, and so did his coaches. Yet Price was put out
to pasture by the selectors without so much as a press release, let
alone a farewell match. The message from the powers that be is clear: we
decide your fate.
"That, for me, is the fundamental problem, until players are valued
accordingly," added Streak. "Once that happens then you can demand
performances from them and they'll be more accountable to how they
perform because you're looking after them. That's your product. Till
that mentality changes amongst our admin we're going to keep going down
that slippery path until we get to our final demise. [ZC] seemingly
don't care. I think their attitude is those guys are lucky to have a
job. They don't look at them as - if those guys don't perform, we don't
have a job."
Whether or not they have the full support of their board, and whether or
not they believe they're fairly remunerated and looked after,
Zimbabwe's cricketers know that, ultimately, their success or failure is
down to their own hard work.
"Most of us know that cricket is all we've got and we are looking after
it the best way we can," Taylor said when Zimbabwe returned to Test
cricket in 2011. "We know that given our circumstances we may have to
work harder than others, but the guys have never been afraid of hard
work."
Life isn't fair, and nor is the international cricket system. George
Monbiot once said that if wealth was the inevitable result of hard work
and enterprise, every woman in Africa would be a millionaire. The same
might be said of cricketers in Zimbabwe.
No comments:
Post a Comment