India 362 for 1 (Rohit 141*, Kohli 100*, Dhawan 95) beat Australia 359 for 5 (Bailey 92*, Hughes 83) by nine wickets
|
"Now this is another fine mess you've got us into," goes the constant
refrain from India's batsmen to their bowlers. At times, the mess is so
huge the batsmen fail to clear it up, despite their best efforts. At
times, the batsmen do such a thorough job, their refrain to the bowlers
changes to, "So that's all you've got?" It was the latter occasion
tonight. India's bowlers leaked 359, the same score they had in the 2003
World Cup final. Only once had a bigger target been chased in ODI
history, the famous Wanderers 438 game. Leave alone 359, India had never
chased even 300 successfully against Australia.
All that changed, as Shikhar Dhawan, Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli
made a mockery of the target, if a mockery can indeed be made of a
target of 360. India got there with nine wickets and 39 deliveries to
spare. Kohli registered the fastest ODI century by an Indian, in 52
balls. Rohit, accommodated by the team management and scrutinised by the
media and fans for years, made his third hundred in 104 games, and his
first since 2010. But it was Shikhar Dhawan, the golden boy of 2013,
who set up the chase with a bludgeoned 95.
Dhawan and Rohit racked up 176 for the opening wicket in 26.1 overs, and
Rohit and Kohli 186 for the second in only 17.2 overs. India began
solidly against the fast bowlers and went through a short lull against
the spinners before Dhawan hit a flurry of boundaries that more than
made up for the brief let-up. During his brief career, Dhawan has made
sure he makes let-offs and good fortune count. He was put down on 18 off
Clint McKay and survived a very close stumping appeal on 42 against
Xavier Doherty. After both reprieves, he let loose a volley of imperious
strokes. He charged the fast bowlers, especially Shane Watson
repeatedly, to power them through the covers. He pulled with confidence,
and even the extra pace of Mitchell Johnson could not rein him in.
Rohit wasn't as free-flowing at the time but that did not take away from
his contribution to the stand. He was strong through and over the
covers against the quicks. He ended the fallow period of five overs for
18 runs against the spinners by stepping out and lifting Glenn Maxwell
for six. Barring that insignificant sequence, Australia were never able
to build any pressure, conceding boundaries regularly.
|
'It's absolutely deflating' - Bailey
|
|
The only challenge in front of India now was whether the rest would be
able to keep up with the frenetic pace the openers had set. Kohli came
in and stepped up the tempo so emphatically, the conclusion was foregone
long before India arrived home.
The openers had ensured India stayed in sight of an asking-rate of over
seven; Kohli made it drop rapidly. As soon as he arrived, he started
stepping out and muscling sixes, against seam and spin alike. Kohli hit
seven sixes in all, and on the whole, the match descended into a
Twenty20-style innings where one boundary merged into each successive
one with the collective impact of deflating the bowlers and rendering
them almost irrelevant.
Rohit played second fiddle in both partnerships, but was always in
control of the situation. As he pulled a six to move to 75, he collapsed
in pain from a cramp in his leg. He's been accused of being soft, of
lacking temperament, but he took treatment and nearly doubled his score.
He hared back for twos as the non-striker, and celebrated an emotional
and long overdue century with screams and invectives.
It was improbable to even imagine Australia losing after making 359.
Their first three batsmen delivered the platform with three
half-centuries and George Bailey and Glenn Maxwell savaged an already
clueless India attack. Roughed up by Aaron Finch, Phillip Hughes and
Shane Watson, India's bowlers leaked 96 in 8.3 overs against the
fourth-wicket duo of Bailey and Maxwell, and 122 in the last ten overs.
It was the first time the first five batsmen had made fifties in an ODI.
But it was also to be the night India executed their highest successful
chase.
No comments:
Post a Comment