|
Andrew Strauss,
the former England captain, has called for England players to be
allowed to play in the IPL or risk falling behind the major cricketing
nations in the shorter format of the game.
Strauss contends in his newly-published autobiography, Driving Ambition,
that established players are left in limbo when it comes to T20, unable
to develop their skills either in IPL or in England's domestic
tournament due to non-stop international commitments.
His remarks come as the ECB and players' representatives, led by the
Professional Cricketers' Association, seek to conclude an agreement on
England central contracts in which the opportunity to play in the IPL
has been a major bone of contention.
Strauss, conservative by instinct, writes: "Going to India, surrounding
yourself with the best players in the world and learning how to innovate
and adapt in vastly different conditions must surely be of huge benefit
to players (not to mention the obvious benefits to their bank
accounts).
"Unfortunately, the IPL teams are reluctant to select England players,
knowing that they will not be available for the whole tournament. In
addition the ECB is less-than-keen to see its best assets wandering off
to a foreign domestic tournament when they should be getting invaluable
rest.
"However, if England are serious about being a force in the
international game, one thing the administrators have to look at is
creating a window to allow our players to participate. The IPL is not
going anywhere and we run the risk of slipping behind other teams in
both ODI and Twenty20 cricket if our players don't participate."
Strauss turned down ECB entreaties to apply for the role of managing
director of England cricket, which is soon to be vacated by Hugh Morris,
the man centrally involved in contract discussions on behalf of the
ECB. Instead he will commit most of his energy to his corporate
consultancy business. If that spares Strauss from coming up with his own
solution to what is arguably the most intractable issue in English
cricket, his impatience for change is clear.
"New players coming into the England side in recent years have generally
had a reasonable level of experience in the Twenty20 game and have
managed to expand their games accordingly.
"What remains a problem, though, is that players who are already part of
the England set-up do not play a lot of domestic Twenty20 cricket, so
ironically their skills do not continue to develop as much as might be
the case. For me, that makes the opportunity for England players to
compete in the IPL a really important issue."
England have switched the order of their spring internationals in 2014,
preceding the early Test series against Sri Lanka with a mix of T20 and
ODIs, which has encouraged the belief that England - and Sri Lanka -
players with IPL contracts will be allowed to use IPL as an acceptable
warm-up and return for the start of England's international season at
the last minute.
Strauss had personal experience of the pressures that IPL has brought to
bear on English cricket when he became embroiled in the long-running
power struggle between the ECB and Kevin Pietersen in the 2012 South
Africa series. Pietersen took offence at the ECB's insistence that his
wish to play IPL must always be secondary to his international duties.
For Strauss, England Test cricket remains sacrosanct: "The ECB were
unwilling - rightly in my opinion - to let any player either miss or not
be properly prepared to play in a Test match to fulfil IPL
obligations."
To maintain Test cricket's supremacy, Strauss writes that administrators
should place a keener focus on developing cricketers for the five-day
game, which the current county system does not best serve; Strauss
regarding it as putting volume ahead of intensity - a blow for the ECB
which embarks upon its latest restructuring of the county game next
season.
"In England, we should have an advantage over other countries because of
our long-established domestic structure," he says. "What is desperately
needed, in my opinion, is for that structure to move with the times.
"Administrators need to ask themselves, 'What is the best system for
producing excellent England cricketers?' As that is where all the
revenues for the game come from, rather than 'What is in the best
interests of county members?' Looking at it from that standpoint would
result in a very different domestic structure from the one we currently
employ."
No comments:
Post a Comment